- The term equity is used instead of the common
expression 'equality" which is
sometimes mistakenly understood to mean absolute equality in each and
every
detailed item of comparison rather than the overall equality. Equity is
used here
to mean justice and overall equality of the totality of rights and
responsibilities of both genders. It does allow for the possibility of
variations
in specific items within the overall balance and equality. It is
analogous to two
persons possessing diverse currencies amounting, for each person to the
equivalence of US$1000. While each of the two persons may possess more
of one
currency than the other, the total value still comes to US$1000 in each
case. It
should be added that from an Islamic perspective, the roles of men and
women are
complementary and cooperative rather than competitive.
- The Sunnah refers to the
words, actions, and confirmations (consent) of the
Prophet Muhammad in matters pertaining to the meaning and practice of
Islam.
Another common term which some authorities consider to be equivalent to
the
Sunnah is the Hadeeth (plural: Ahadeeth) which literally means
"sayings."
- In both Qur'anic
references, 15:29 and 32:99, the Arabic terms used are
basharan and al Insaun both mean a human being or a person. English
translations
do not usually convey this meaning and commonly use the terms "man" or
the
pronoun" him" to refer to "person" without a particular gender
identification.
Equally erroneous is the common translation of Bani Adam into "sons of
Adam" or
"men" instead of a more accurate term "children of Adam."
- The emphasis is ours. The
explanatory "both"{ was added whenever the Our'anic
Arabic text addresses Adam and Eve, like "lahoma, akala, akhrajahoma."
This was
done in order to avoid misinterpreting the English term "you" to mean
an address
to a singular person. For the Biblical version of the story and its
implications,
see The Holy Bible, RSV, American Bible Society, New York: 1952:
Genesis,
chapters 23, especially 3:6, 12, 1717; Levi ticus 12:17; 15:19 30; and
Timothy 2:11 14.
-
A common question raised
in the West is whether a Muslim woman can be ordained
as a priest as more "liberal" churches do? It should be remembered that
there is
no "church" or "priesthood" in Islam. The question of "ordaining" does
not arise.
However, most of the common "priestly" functions such as religious
education,
spiritual and social counseling are not forbidden to Muslim women in a
proper
Islamic context. A woman, however, may not lead prayers since Muslim
prayers
involve prostrations and body contact. Since the prayer leader is
supposed to
stand in front of the congregation and may move forward in the middle
of crowded
rows, it would be both inappropriate and uncomfortable for a female to
be in such
a position and prostrate, hands, knees and forehead on the ground with
rows of
men behind here. A Muslim woman may be an Islamic scholar, In the early
days of
Islam, there were several examples of female scholars who taught both
genders.
- This contrast with the
legal provisions in Europe which did not recognize the
right until nearly 13 centuries after Islam. "By a series of acts
starting with
the Married Women's Property Act in 1879, amended in 1882 and 1997,
married women
achieved the right to won property and to enter into contracts on a par
with
spinsters, widows, and divorcees." See Encyclopedia Britannica, 1968,
vol. 23, p.
624.
- This period is usually
three months. If the wife is pregnant, it extends until
childbirth.
- Ahmad Ibn Hanbal
(compiler), Musnad Ibn Hanbal, Dar al Ma'arif, Cairo: 1950
and 1955, vols. 3 and 4. Hadith nos. 1957 and 2104.
- Narrated in Al Bayhaqi
and Ibn Majah, quoted in M. S. Aftfi, Al Martah wa
Huququhafi al Islam (in Arabic), Maktabat al Nahdhah, Cairo: 1988, p.
71.
- Ibn Majah (compiler),
Sunan Ibn Majah, Dar Ihya' al Kutub al Arabiyah, Cairo:
1952, vol. 1, Hadith #1873.
- Matn al Bukhari, op.
cit., vol. 3, p. 257.
- Riyad al Saliheen, op.
cit, pp. 140.
-
In the event of a family
dispute, the Qur'an exhorts the husband to treat his
wife kindly and not to overlook her positive aspects. If the problem
relates to
the wife's behavior, her husband may exhort her and appeal for reason.
In most
cases, this measure is likely to be sufficient. In cases where the
problem
continues, the husband may express his displeasure in another peaceful
manner by
sleeping in a separate bed from hers. There are cases, however where a
wife
persists in deliberate mistreatment of her husband and disregard for
her marital
obligations. Instead of divorce, the husband may resort to another
measure that
may save the marriage, at least in some cases. Such a measure is more
accurately
described as a gentle tap on the body, but never on the face, making it
more of a
symbolic measure than a punitive one. Following is the related Qur'anic
text:
Men are the protectors and maintains of women because Allah has given
the one
more (strength) than the other and because they support them from their
means.
Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient and guard in (the
husband's)
absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose
part you
fear disloyalty and ill conduct, admonish them (first), (next) refuse
to share
their beds (and last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to
obedience seek
not against them means (of annoyance): for Allah is Most High, great
(above you
all). (Qur'an 4:34)
Even here, that maximum measure is limited by the following:
- It must be seen as a
rare exception to the repeated exhortation of mutual
respect, kindness and good treatment discussed earlier. Based on the
Qur'an and Hadeeth, this measure may be used in the case of lewdness on
the part of the wife
or extreme refraction and rejection of the husband's reasonable
requests on a
consistent basis (nushuz). Even then other measures such as exhortation
should be
tried first.
-
As defined by the
Hadeeth, it is not permissible to strike anyone's face,
cause any bodily harm or even be harsh. What the Hadeeth qualified as
dharban
ghayra mubarrih or light beating was interpreted by early jurists as a
(symbolical) use of the miswak (a small natural toothbrush).
They further qualified permissible "beating" as beating that leaves no
mark on
the body. It is interesting that this latter fourteen centuries old
qualifier is
the criterion used in contemporary American law to separate a light and
harmless
tap or strike from "abuse" in the legal sense. This makes it clear that
even this
extreme, last resort and "lesser of the two evils" measure that may
save the
marriage does not meet the definitions of "physical abuse," "family
violence," of
"wife battering" in the twentieth century laws in liberal democracies,
where such
extremes are commonplace that they are seen as national concerns.
-
Permissibility of
such symbolical expression of the seriousness of continued
refraction does not imply its desirability. In several Ahadeeth,
Prophet Muhammad
discouraged this measure. Among his sayings: "Do not beat the female
servants of
Allah," "Some (women visited my family complaining about their husbands
(beating
them). These (husbands) are not the best of you," "[Is it not a shame
that], one
of you beats his wife like [an unscrupulous person] beats a slave and
maybe he
sleeps with her at the end of the day." See Riyad Al Saliheen, op cit.,
pp.
130 140. In another Hadeeth, the Prophet said:
"How does anyone of you beat his wife as he beats the stallion camel
and then he
may embrace (sleep with) her?" Shaheeh Al Bukhari, op. cit., vol. 8,
Hadeeth no.
68, pp. 42 43.
- True following of the
Sunnah is to follow the example of the Prophet Muhammad,
who never resorted to that measure regardless of the circumstances.
- Islamic teachings are
universal in nature. They respond to the needs and
circumstances of diverse times, cultures, and circumstances but
unnecessary in
others. Some measures may work in some cases, cultures, or with certain
persons
but may not be effective in others. By definition a "permissible" it is
neither
required encouraged, or forbidden. In fact, it may be better to spell
out the
extent of permissibility such as in the issue at hand, than leaving it
unrestricted and unqualified or ignoring it all together. In the
absence of
strict qualifiers, persons may interpret the matter in their own way
lending to
excesses and real abuse.
- Any excess, cruelty,
family violence, or abuse committed by any "Muslim" can
never be traced, honestly, to any revelatory text (Qur'an and Hadeeth).
Such
excesses and violations are to be blamed on the person(s) himself as it
shows
that he is paying lip service to Islamic teachings and injunctions and
is failing
to follow the true sunnah of the Prophet.
-
For more details on
marriage dissolution and custody of children, see A. Abd
al Ati, Family Structure in Islam, Indianapolis: American Trust
Publications,
1977, pp. 217 49.
-
For more details on the
issue of polygyny, see Jamal A. Badawi, Polygyny in
Islamic Law, Plainfield, IN: American Trust Publications, also Islamic
Teachings
(audio series), Islamic Information Foundation, 1982, album IV.
-
See for example, Edward
A. Westermarck, The History of Human Marriage, 4th
ed. (London: Macmlllan, 1925), vol 3, pp. 42 43; also Encyclopedia
BibRca, Rev.
T. K. Cheyene and J. S. Black, eds.) (London: Macmillan, 1925), vol. 3,
p 2946.
-
A. M. B. 1. Al Bukhari
(compiler) Matn al Bukhari, Cairo: Dar Ihya al Kutub
al Arabiyah, n.d., vol. 3 Kitab al Adab, p. 47. Translated by the
author. For a
similar English translation of this Hadeeth, see Sahih al Bukhari
translated by
M. M. Khan Maktabat al Riyadh al Hadeethah, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, i982,
colt 8,
the Book of ai Adab, Hadeeth no. 2, p. 2.
- Narrated by Aisha,
collected by Ibn Asakir in Silsilat Kunaz al Sunnah 1, Al./ami Al
Sagheer, Ist ed. 1410 AH. A computer program.
- Riyadh al Saliheen, op.
cit., p. 139.
|